| . | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organizational Culture | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| High-performing Teams | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Human Dynamics at Work | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Learning Organizations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Planned Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organizational Diagnosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MAIN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
concept of organizational culture refers to a group of elements that
encompasses a company’s paradigms.
It includes the practices, behaviors and predispositions that
each organization develops through social interaction in order to deal
with its adaptation to the environment and its internal coherence.
It can be said that culture is to the organization as personality
is to the individual. It
includes observable aspects such as the dress code, status symbols, and
language. There
are other aspects that, while not as obvious, influence the culture
patterns, such as social norms, actual values, and company principles.
At the deepest level of culture, the taken-for-granted beliefs or
paradigms are the true root of culture.
Companies are seldom aware of what happens at this level,
although this determines all culture expressions. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
The understanding of organizational culture is a complex matter since most interactions occur at the unconscious level. The process implies identifying the characteristics of the culture at different levels, searching for connections to the paradigms or taken-for-granted beliefs.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
It is common that individuals have to work at different geographical locations or interact with colleagues from other countries. In these cases, individuals normally face culture shock and uncertainty. It is caused by the different culture traits of each society. The greater the difference among culture, the greater the culture shock will be. This process causes personal disorientation, and causes a loss in personal productivity.
In
an increasingly global society, executives and employees are trained,
work, and perform negotiations in other world locations.
In order to take advantage of the experience and avoid a decrease
in productivity, the individual needs to understand the culture he/she
will be immersed in as well as its business practices.
He also needs to be aware of his own frame of reference and
develop quick adjustment mechanisms.
When he does it, he will be most effective and will attain the
best results when in
contact with another culture.
This process includes:
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
The organizational climate includes all perceptions that workers have about their work environment. It includes different areas, such as interpersonal relationships, trust and openness levels, physical and emotional work conditions, among other topics.
It is important to understand the characteristics of organizational climate since it is positively associated to job satisfaction and employee commitment, which, in turn, influence employee motivation, productivity and retention. As a result of understanding their team’s organizational climate, managers can take actions to improve their quality of work life and influence their performance and work dedication.
The
process employed to transform an organizational climate includes:
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
When
an individual has to move to another country or region in a relatively
permanent mode, s/he is inserted into another culture. In this scenario,
the impact of culture shock is more severe than when the individual only
has to visit the culture frequently.
The process needs a deeper understanding of the culture to be
entered, and making adjustments to personal paradigms in order to be an
effective and functional citizen of the new environment. Frequently, relocation happens to similar cultures (for example, a culture with the same language), resulting in misinterpreting the impact of cultural shock. This error in evaluation may cause significant losses in personal productivity. By the same token, if the new culture is very different to the known culture, the insertion could be long and difficult and might bring an important reduction in personal effectiveness. When the adjustment is dealt promptly, the individual will be fully productive sooner.
The process to deal with immersion into a different culture includes:
This
process is more effective when it is started at least one month before
departure to the new culture.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
When
a company acquires an organized business, or two companies merge,
managers typically pay special attention to integrating all operating
systems of the new entity.
However, it is common to neglect the impact of mergers on
organizational cultures. This
is so because cultures are intangible and operate at a relatively
unconscious level. Also,
there is little knowledge on how to handle the process.
Merging cultures is the result of integrating two organizations
with different paradigms, behaviors and predispositions.
The process may take years or not happen at all unless it is
managed in a directed and guided manner. As
a result, a company may have two different cultures indefinitely, presenting
conflicting elements that undermine organizational effectiveness. All
companies that face mergers or acquisitions should consider the cultural
aspect seriously. Even
when the operating systems are fully integrated, if the desired culture
is not identified and aligned, the actual effectiveness could be
seriously undermined for a long time and generate unnecessary costs
resulting from continuous alignment efforts.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Este sitio es propiedad de Transformaciones Organizacionales Todos los derechos reservados Diseño e implementación: www.DVDMcr.com/web |
|